Tags: Essay On The Gospel Of LukeMicroeconomics Term Paper OutlineWhere To Buy Litmus Paper StripsIraq War Justification EssayCharacter Analysis Essay Scarlet IbisWrite Discussion Part Research Paper
The debate about whether Jackson was a hero or the villain of his own story arises when we look at the contradiction in what he believed and what he did.Coming from an unfortunate background himself, Jackson took it upon himself to create a system which would benefit the poor and the weak instead of just the privileged.After that, it was a clear path to becoming president of the United States.
Meanwhile, the reputation of democracy as a form of government went from unutterably bad to unassailably good. In 1837, Noah Webster vented his disgust at democracy’s rise.
“It has been a prevailing opinion, even with many of our greatest men, that the columns of newspapers for thirty or forty years, until it is considered as expressing political axioms of unquestionable truth.” As a young man, Webster had made his name writing spelling books and editing staunchly Federalist newspapers.
“He that is not a Democrat is an aristocrat or a monocrat,” one Jeffersonian declared.
When Jefferson was elected President, in 1800, the Federalists, those rank monocrats, lost control of the government.
It can’t be denied that Andrew Jackson was a man who knew how to obtain power and hold it.
He made it clear during his presidency that the president was the one who would be the ultimate decision maker.While a Bible’s worth is hard to measure, the Scout guide, at fifty cents, was an awfully good bargain, and was, in any case, the book you’d most like to have if you were shipwrecked somewhere, not least because it included the chapter “How to Make Fire Without Matches.” But “The Rise of American Democracy” promised, invaluably, “to make clear how Americans have come to live and to believe as they do.” It was also a quick read. Casner, a Connecticut schoolteacher, and Ralph Henry Gabriel, a Yale professor, set out to make history matter.In a foreword written in the dark days of 1937, when Fascism, not democracy, was on the rise, they offered a sober historian’s creed: “We live today in perilous times; so did many of our forefathers.Andrew Jackson is considered to be perhaps one of the most complex political figures in US history.Some view him as a hero who worked for the people while others consider him to be an aggressive villain who plundered without a second thought. He became the 7th president of the US in 1828, but he had to work all his life to get to this position.However, his concern for delivering the people their rights was not seen when he signed treaties that resulted in the displacement of hundreds of Native Americans from their homelands.Also, there was no action taken against the practice of slavery during his time, nor were the blacks and the women given more rights.But Scene 3, in which Columbia takes her awestruck European student of democracy to “the Western plains in the 1840’s” to witness a shambles of bedraggled pioneers scuffling across the stage, is undoubtedly the play’s climax, since it combines singing, cowboy costumes, and parts not only for every student but for pets, too, as per the sociable stage direction “.” While the pioneers hum the tune to “Oh!Susanna,” the boy, puzzled, turns to Columbia: “I understand that they are settling your great continent, but I do not understand what they have to do with democracy.” To which Columbia replies, “Look at these men and women. Yet they are braving the dangers of the wilderness. Men do not have to have possessions to do great things.” No matter if the scenery toppled, if the pioneers tripped in their boots, if the dogs barked and bayed; the audience had been treated to a concise restatement of what was then a dominant interpretation of the rise of American democracy—that it was fuelled by the settling of the frontier and that it chiefly involved the hardscrabble striving of poor white men. But a Democracy Theme does run through the whole text. Within the lifetime of, say, Noah Webster, an American born in 1758 and dead by 1843, the proportion of white men who were eligible to vote grew from less than half to nearly all.In 1828, he published his magnum opus, “An American Dictionary of the English Language.” He was a born definer, not to say a mincer, of words.About the rise of democracy, he complained, “The men who have preached these doctrines have never defined what they mean by the as much as Kings,” he wrote.