Keep in mind that not all papers require thesis statements. Your assignment may suggest several ways of looking at a topic; or it may name a fairly general concept that you will explore or analyze in your paper.
If in doubt, please consult your instructor for assistance. Reason This topic avoids generalities such as “Spain” and “World War II,” addressing instead on Franco’s role (a specific aspect of “Spain”) and the diplomatic relations between the Allies and Axis (a specific aspect of World War II). Identified topic (warfare being a major theme in that work).
Before you go too far, however, ask yourself whether your topic is worthy of your efforts.
Try to avoid topics that already have too much written about them (i.e., “eating disorders and body image among adolescent women”) or that simply are not important (i.e. These topics may lead to a thesis that is either dry fact or a weird claim that cannot be supported.
This means that you cannot include everything you’ve learned about your topic, nor should you go off in several directions.
If you end up covering too many different aspects of a topic, your paper will sprawl and be unconvincing in its argument, and it most likely will not fulfull the assignment requirements.
You can then turn this “controlling idea” into a purpose statement about what you intend to do in your paper.
Consult the examples below for suggestions on how to look for patterns in your evidence and construct a purpose statement.
These patterns or data may then lead you to some conclusions about your topic and suggest that you can successfully argue for one idea better than another.
For instance, you might find out that Franco first tried to negotiate with the Axis, but when he couldn’t get some concessions that he wanted from them, he turned to the Allies.